Food for thought

October 14, 2002 - 1:26 pm 7 Comments

Do advocates of alternative lifestyles sabotage their own causes by indicating that it’s acceptable for strangers to discuss what goes on between two consenting adults behind closed doors?

7 Responses to “Food for thought”

  1. JenBen Says:


  2. KT Says:

    I’d have to say YES. Yes, they do.

  3. Kathryn Says:

    A little more context, please?

  4. Kenneth Says:

    Only if you think that being gay is contained only by the physical act of sex.

    If that’s true, I’ve not been gay for 7 years. 😛

    (And I hate the phrase “alternate lifestyle”. How clinical!)

  5. Kenneth Says:

    And besides, the “discussing” thing is okay. It is the “prohibiting” thing that usually gets us fags all riled up.

  6. me Says:

    surely alternative lifestyles doesnt mean gay. doesnt it mean something like swingers? or people into S&M?

  7. michigan Says:

    probably, i mean.
    what the fuck are you people talking about anyway?